Comments on: Wewease Woger! http://chuck.goolsbee.org/archives/168       goolsbee.org, serving useless content from an undisclosed location since 1997 Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:10:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: gondwana http://chuck.goolsbee.org/archives/168#comment-377 gondwana Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:48:09 +0000 http://chuck.goolsbee.org/archives/168#comment-377 argh - Lost in Translation I remember ... female lead forgotten... the XJ220 will need to get the interior pimped I think! :-) ta Jerome argh - Lost in Translation I remember … female lead forgotten…

the XJ220 will need to get the interior pimped I think! :-)

ta

Jerome

]]> By: cg http://chuck.goolsbee.org/archives/168#comment-374 cg Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:44:43 +0000 http://chuck.goolsbee.org/archives/168#comment-374 Jerome, Scarlett Johansson was the female lead in the excellent flick "Lost in translation". As for the XJ220, yeah, the interior is rather cheesy. Somewhere between a DeLorean and a Chevrolet. --chuck Jerome, Scarlett Johansson was the female lead in the excellent flick “Lost in translation”.

As for the XJ220, yeah, the interior is rather cheesy. Somewhere between a DeLorean and a Chevrolet.

–chuck

]]> By: gondwana http://chuck.goolsbee.org/archives/168#comment-370 gondwana Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:20:03 +0000 http://chuck.goolsbee.org/archives/168#comment-370 what was she waxing again? and who is she anyway? and this is the interior of your dream car Chuck!? cheesy indeed... bring me my DB9 sir! Jerome what was she waxing again? and who is she anyway?

and this is the interior of your dream car Chuck!? cheesy indeed… bring me my DB9 sir!

Jerome

]]> By: Roger http://chuck.goolsbee.org/archives/168#comment-367 Roger Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:39:36 +0000 http://chuck.goolsbee.org/archives/168#comment-367 If you have to ask the price, you probably can't afford it. I can't even afford to ask about asking about the price. If you have to ask the price, you probably can’t afford it. I can’t even afford to ask about asking about the price.

]]> By: cg http://chuck.goolsbee.org/archives/168#comment-366 cg Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:00:32 +0000 http://chuck.goolsbee.org/archives/168#comment-366 lol! You are correct sir! What's her rate for a full detail? lol! You are correct sir!

What’s her rate for a full detail?

]]>